Is Talent Or Discipline the Crux of Good Poker?

Talent is an ambiguous word. The extent to which a person's potential is disclosed depends on the goals that person sets. Nobody ever relied on pure talent, except their output was entirely spontaneous or simplistically minimalist. What distinguished the greatest players in any discipline has always been their willingness to be talent, their willingness to train themselves. Most people have potential and know what talent is, but they either romanticize it or knowly avoid it, preferring an easy life.

Top players take a hard look at their abilities and do not run from the strenuous and unfamiliar. They are their own best criticisms and care about becoming ever better at whatever it is they do. The big winners. as well as everyone else that plays the game. have a sense of what talent play is relative to current poker tradition. What separates them is that they reach beyond whatever talent they have to impose upon themselves a rigorous pattern of discipline.

The successful player gains experience by playing the game constantly and learning from all those hands. This is how they develop the best methods of play in many different situations.

Talent without discipline is hanging on luck. This is the mark of the amateur. He will play for the adrenaline rush and the thrill of that sure jackpot that's just around the corner. Talent with discipline aims at reducing chance to its minimum. The expert player has no interest in his adrenaline, he has a profounding interest in emptying his opponent's wallet, no matter how good or bad that opponent is. To the pro, the game is a battle pitched against chance and his opponent's expertise.

Start with self-searching and analyze carefully what you discover. If you allow yourself to be disturbed with the weak points you discover, then deny them for self-preservation, you will not learn from them nor will you overcome them. It is destructive to cling to activities that you have no talent for and to avoid reaching out to find something different that you just might excel in. Some indulge in the fantasy that someday just by hanging around they will gain talent in the activities that are not good at but refuse to admit the truth These guys are a professional poker player's dream opponents

The decision as to which poker to play is the first step for the expert player. The challenges in limit poker are quite different than those found in no-limit. To play limit poker well demands patience and a certain risk-avoidance type of personality. It also requires time to learn its advantages and the methods to play it well. To play no-limit well, an antithetical list of qualities are engaged. No-limit rivals on what is seemingly acts of random aggression performed by a cool calculating personality.

Cockiness is a common flaw among amateurs allowing them to play without restraint. The concentration is on the knowledge that they are "good" players and do not ever run into a losing situation where they should fold up their tent. On the other hand if you are the kind of player who is not impressed with yourself, but your goal is to win lots of hands consistently, you know well when to beat a hasty retreat and cut your losses.

Everyone will find themselves in hot water on occasion, the pro clearly identifies the situation and will get out before the water becomes even hotter. The last of his worries is losing face.

[ad_2]

Source by Thomas Kearns